After his interview on TVNZ yesterday where he talked about the congestion free network, Len Brown headed south to Wiri launch the driving simulators for our new electric trains. Patrick and I both went along to have a look at them and also have a go. These simulators – there are two of them – are brand new and are intended to help with the training of drivers. The console is laid out exactly the same as the new trains are, while the performance is meant to match what is expected to happen out on the network. To get the network right the company that made the simulators spent some time filming the entire Auckland network and have recreated it in the simulation software including the future Parnell station. There is one station that can control the two simulators and throw at the trainees a range of events to practice on from different weather conditions to cars on the tracks or mechanical faults.

Here is the press release from Auckland Transport about them:

Auckland’s train drivers are learning to drive the city’s new electric trains prior to the first one arriving from Spain at the end of the month.

Auckland Transport has set up two ‘state of the art’ simulators which are being used to train the drivers. Each simulator is laid out exactly like the driver’s cab in an electric train with all the controls in the same place and a large flat screen display in place of the windscreen. Rather like a giant video game, the screen displays the view that the driver would see from the cab.

The simulator is programmed with the Auckland railway network, which was filmed last year and converted into video graphics, allowing drivers to be trained to drive over the full network.

Auckland Transport Chairman Dr Lester Levy was today shown the simulator. “I was given some basic training on how to drive it, the new trains are going to be great for Auckland commuters and, if the simulator is anything to go by, they’ll be a pleasure to drive.”

The simulator can be set to show daytime or night-time and includes a range of weather conditions, it can also simulate faults in the train or events on the line.

Transdev driver trainer William Els says, “Drivers can familiarise themselves with all the safety features before they even get in the cab or out on the network. The simulator means drivers get more than double the practical experience they would have had otherwise.”

A training instructor sets up the simulator at the start of each training session to select the route, weather, time of day and any incidents or faults that are required for the training session. The trainee then operates the simulator while the instructor monitors progress remotely, using mimic screens and a webcam that shows what the trainee is doing. Every training run is recorded and can be played back and analysed with the trainee.

Transdev Managing Director Terry Scott says, “Safety is a priority at Transdev so having a tool like the simulator for our drivers to practise on is fantastic.”

Once drivers are competent on the simulator they will be test driving the new trains on the network prior to passenger services starting early next year.

There are 57 three-car train sets being manufactured by Construcciones y Auxilair Ferrocarriles (CAF) in Spain, all will be operating by mid-2015.

The simulators have been manufactured by Lander Simulation and Training Solution S.A. based in Spain.

Here are some photos of them in action starting off with Len driving out of the Britomart tunnel. Later on he managed to hit a car that had ignored the level crossing at Sarawia St.

Len Britomart

And here is what the simulator looks like from further back.

EMU Simulator

And lastly here is Patrick having a go, I hear he is now considering a change of career.

Patrick Driving

While the rail network has been fairly comprehensively modelled, some of the surrounding areas aren’t quite so exact. For example as this video hopefully shows, the section from Remuera to Greenlane shows the motorway as just a two lane road. Of course not that it makes a huge difference to the train driver how accurate the motorway is.

As for the first train itself, it is currently on a boat and somewhere in that small expanse of water known as the Pacific Ocean after it passed through the Panama Canal late last week. It is due to arrive in the country on August 24.

For some more on the simulator, both Stuff and TVNZ also produced pieces on it.

Share this

21 comments

  1. How fast do the simulators ‘go’?

    I imagine they’ll use these to work out provisional schedules, before testing them.

    1. Simulators are primarily for drivers to learn the ‘road’; every little detail and quirk of the network. Changes in grade have a big impact on acceleration and deceleration for example… at one point the screen went white and i thought it had malfunctioned by it was just the instructors playing with me by simulating heavy fog… drivers are expected to be able to drive ‘blind’. They also put a car on the track as they did for Len and LL, but as I had seen that earlier I was expecting it.

      It’s great that these will be so much quicker and smoother that the current museum pieces, the regenerative breaking is really cool, and just fantastic from a net energy standpoint, as is the whole battery-less electric operation. Not to mention how quiet they’ll be and the total absence of those vile carcinogenic diesel fumes.

      But as so much of it is automated I actually found it pretty boring; I don’t think I’ll be giving up any of my day jobs to become a train driver anytime soon; but then the whole point of transit is not having to drive. I’ll be very happy being further back in these electric beauties and online.

      Happy to leave the little boy thrills of driving trains and cars to those with nothing better to do.

  2. Based on the “boring” bit and the recent Spanish situation, and considering it’s 2013, why the heck do they have drivers that are allowed to be control (accelerate) the train? Surely it should be 100% automatic permission based on a trio of signals Typically GPS, dead reconning via accelerometers, and in track RFID. It even more silly considering than most of the passengers on the train carry a pocket computer (AKA cellphones) have those three sensors build in, and yet the train doesn’t !

    1. Plus, if you automate the trains (which IS easier than planes), then you still would likely need a driver anyway for legal reasons / for emergency situations like someone running out on the track (sure, you could try to automate THAT danger recognition too…)

      So as long as we aren’t quite at that stage, lets give the drivers SOMETHING to do, otherwise they’ll fall asleep, and then they won’t even be any use for emergency stops.

      1. “if you automate the trains (which IS easier than planes), then you still would likely need a driver anyway for legal reasons.”

        That’s not at all true. Totally automated trains are common all over the world, and are a great way to make public transport more affordable/profitable because they cut operating costs and are very safe. In addition, drivers on large trains are usually locked away anyway, so are likley to be of little help if there’s a problem at the other end of the train. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_driverless_trains

      2. I never said driver-less, just that driver (aka safety officer) is not allowed to accelerate the train. I think a safety officer at the front of the train using long range radar, night vision, metal detection, what ever… to ensure the track ahead is clear and in good condition, and stops the train when a situation occurs, or the software crashes would be an good idea

        1. There are many examples all over the world where even a safety officer isn’t necessary – the system operates entirely electronically. The UTO list on the wikipedia page I linked to has dozens of examples.

        2. And not a single one of them runs in a shared corridor with road level crossings, from what I could see. Until Auckland’s passenger rail network has no freight trains and no level crossings, even ATO, never mind UTO, just ain’t happening. It’s not safe.

  3. Also, software controlled acceleration and deceleration will be faster, smoother, and more power efficient if it has track gradients, weather, etc. data available

  4. Nice post Matt L; must have a look next time I’m at the depot. I see that hats are not allowed in the cabin…

  5. The simulator does not replicate every quirk of the network! No two platforms are the same and the approach can very depending on the stick of train being driven. Even on sections where it looks straight and flat are not always so. The simulator is a real boon for training purposes but can not replace real footplate time for improving driving technique and road knowledge.

    As for ‘ little boys thrills’ I take that as rude and derogatory. Driving any type of train is not to be taken lightly, we are not Auckland car drivers! As for it being boring, yes it can but drivers must have the ability to concentrate and do repetitive tasks. Not every plebeian can do this.

    Pete, yes this Is 2013. You may not be able to handle accelerating a vehicle but train drivers can! Also with ETCS on the EMUs (as long as done properly) any train over the set speed will be pulled back down to correct speed and logged in the black box. We will have a FULL ETCS unlike the Spanish line where the crash happened…….apparently it was a ‘classic’ (non protected) section of the line.

    As for automated trains….good grief people! Use technology to enhance the workplace not replace the workforce. How would you like that to happen to YOU?

    Remember it’s not just desk jockeys that view this blog but people within the public transport industry.

    1. L.E. A fair point regarding Patrick’s unnecessary remark.

      However, I think we can’t negate the fact that for many jobs, machines do perform more reliably than meat – this would include most driving tasks, but also many other tasks – it won’t just be train drivers whose roles are replaced. It is an inevitability that where machines do perform more reliably, they will replace the roles previously filled by humans. A large change in lifestyle is coming for many over the coming decades, and it may be that many will suffer during the transition, as has happened in the past (industrial revolution etc). That doesn’t negate the fact that the change will be good for humanity as a whole.

    2. Sorry L.E., any job a computer can do better than a human, should be done by a computer, there is plenty of other things that need doing

  6. For a desk jockey pleb like me, can someone (L.E?) please explain the controls a train has and the dials/gauges etc that are monitored? Serious question, I’m interested. When I pass the cab of the diesels I like to glance inside…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *