We have been fairly critical of the attempts at communication that Auckland Transport have done to date on the CRL. The biggest problem being that there they have been underselling the project with vague comments about the benefits while also not doing anything to address some of the common misconceptions about the project. Some of it is understandable because the project team are likely focusing on more technical aspects related to the getting the designation sorted out however with a project that still has so much debate around it, I have suggested that more effort is needed so that people can actually understand the impacts it will have.
In recent weeks though we have started to see some of the communication coming out of AT dramatically improve. Both the video and written comms produced for the roll out of the new PT network were fantastic and set a new benchmark (if you haven’t watched the video it is below).
http://youtu.be/TSPArxouaIY
CRL pagePositively we are now starting to see some of the concerns that we raised about the CRL be addressed too. On their e added a diagram showing just how trains might run in the future which clearly shows that trains won’t run around a loop in circles but instead will pass through the city centre and out to another destination. This is much like some of the suggestions we have made before, although without the spur to Dominion Rd that we think is a good idea. It means you could have a one seat journey from the new development in Orakei to watch an event at Eden Park or to go shopping in Newmarket.
I suspect that over time the exact routing pattern could change but in my mind, the most important thing right now is to dispel the myth that trains are just going around in circles. Also interesting is that it shows an arrow carrying on from Onehunga, hopefully we will see more information about that project soon.
There have also been some updates to the benefits of the project including this bit which accompanies the image above.
The CRL completes a “missing link” in Auckland’s transport system, benefiting all of Auckland. The investment will help shape Auckland’s future by supporting the increasing population and driving economic growth.
By getting rid of the dead end at Britomart and joining the rail network through the city to the west it allows a train about every seven to 10 minutes from most Auckland stations.
An independent study, produced in collaboration with central government, shows the CRL, combined with bus improvements, is the only way of meeting transport demand for the city centre within the next 30 years.
Further in a separate page about the benefits of the project they say:
The City Rail Link has transport benefits for large parts of Auckland, including for road users.
Making public transport a better travel choice will ease pressure on roads for those who need to use them.
The benefits come from “joining up” the rail network, allowing trains to run both ways through Britomart, doubling the number of trains that can run. This will mean trains a lot more often at all Auckland stations.
With the CRL, rail can carry about 30,000 people an hour in peak. If the Britomart dead end isn’t removed the limit is 15,000 an hour. In comparison, a single motorway lane can carry 2400 people an hour.
- A train about every five to 10 minutes at peak for most Auckland stations;
- Makes future expansion of the rail network to the North Shore, via Wynyard Quarter, and the airport possible;
- More people on trains will free up roads for those who need them;
- The only transport option to keep speeds on city centre roads dropping to 7km/h by 2021;
- More road space for buses for parts of Auckland not served by rail, such as the North Shore. Without the CRL major bus routes will be at or over capacity in 2021;
- The number of people within 30 minutes train travel of a city centre rail station will double;
- Quicker travel and better access to more parts of the city centre with three new stations near Aotea Square, Karangahape Rd and Newton (near Symonds St/New North Rd intersection).
During the past decade, rail patronage has increased from 2.2 million trips a year to 9.5 million – a growth of 332 per cent. Further growth of the rail system, including increases to train frequency, is constrained by the dead end at Britomart which caps the whole network’s capacity.
This is much improved on what has been said before and covers many of the points we have previously raised. Further segments discuss the economic and urban regeneration benefits – which includes some unfortunately small before and after images of Britomart. The last segment though was quite interesting based on the debate that is emerging as a result of the City Centre Future Access Study. We have mentioned before that it appears both the Government and Ministry of Transport have shifted their positions on the project. From previously saying it wasn’t really needed, the debate now seems the debate is to do with when the project is needed. Auckland Transport say it is needed in 2021 while the Government and MOT are suggesting 2031. The page gives a bit of information about the two options.
2031
- Other options for transport access to/around the city centre are exhausted
- The transport problem will be sufficiently bad to justify the City Rail Link (based on standard transport analysis)
- “Standard” economic thinking is that major benefits are achieved through travel time reduction which requires congestion to worsen for it to be “economically” efficient to build CRL
2021
- Lead development and shape the city centre
- Intervene before problems get too bad.
All up it is good to see some changes being made to help better inform the public. Now we just need to get our elected officials to read it.
Hmmm, maybe trains coming back out from Onehunga to connect with the link to Manakau via Captain Springs Reserve. down what looks suspiciously like a reserved rail corridor, to connect with existing lines at Neilson Street?
Nah. Airport rail.
Airport rail is surely what they are getting at there!
I got contacted by someone from Auckland Transport who wants to have a meeting about the submission I made in support of the CRL. It will be interesting to see what they say. It also appears they are getting in contact with a few others as I was initialled asked if I could go along to a meeting being held today with an apartment board corporate. Sounds like Auckland Transport is stepping up the communication around the CRL. The one point that did make me cringe was that the email I got had the subject “Auckland Transport – City Rail Loop Project” oh well it is a start 🙂
It’s not the link they’ve previously talked about where the SW Motorway has provisions built in for rail to connect from West to South Auckland?
Why not make trains run in a loop? Each line would then be isolated, and any disruptions to one line would not affect others.
Because people don’t want to go around in circles, to put it bluntly, people want to travel in as straight a line as possible between their origin and destination. Loops are an old approach to suburban commuter rail, Auckland is trying to build something closer to a metro or an S Bahn.
Even if everyone was going to the city centre only and not across town, a loop service would be close to useless. Auckland’s ‘loop’ would be 50% longer than Melbournes and almost twice as long as Sydney’s. If you are aware of how slow and infuriating those can be you wouldn’t wish it worse on Auckland.
Disruptions on one line are always going to affect others to some degree, not sure if you realise Bris but Auckland only has two track lines and is only building a two track ‘loop’. The position of Newmarket station offline of Newmarket junction would also necessitate any loop services to skip it, the junction simply couldn’t handle the double movements.
??? STORAGE
??? TRANSFERS
??? DIPLICATION OF SERVICES
You heard of the sentence?
The point about the CRL not simply being a short self contained loop is that the project is in fact about the entire network and the wider city, not just the centre city.
It is, in fact, the killer App for Auckland; transformative.
Much better AT
AT- People like pictures. Posters or web banners of “Who will benefit from the CRL?” would be powerful.
#1 Beneficiary- Motorway Users. More people on trains, less cars on motorway!
AT are telling us that the CRL has a “Cost of $2.86 billion (inflated to year of spend)”.
http://www.aucklandtransport.govt.nz/improving-transport/city-rail-link/Pages/default.aspx
Is this wise?
No it isn’t wise but they’re a timid bunch facing a lot of pressure from people who know the power of made up numbers.
Does anybody feel like doing the maths to figure out the cost if we deflate the cost to year of initial proposal of the Morningside Deviation? (would that be 1918 pounds – based on http://greaterakl.wpengine.com/2013/05/18/arguments-against-the-crl-never-change/ and http://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/cgi-bin/paperspast?a=d&cl=search&d=AS19180614.2.75&srpos=33&e=——-100–1-byDA—0Morningside+Deviation–)
If you deflate using the consumers price index it is approx. 40m pounds, However you would also need to remove OSH and RMA costs which could get you down to 10m pounds. That’s five times more than the average annual capital investment in roads, tramways, railways and power stations during the 1920s.
A huge improvement on their previous communication. Some really good bullet points here, but they still need to refine their “elevator speech” to get them into a TV sound bite. Rinse and repeat until the public understands.
A key point to make to every opponent who derides PT: “every person using PT takes a car off the road YOU want to use”. It’s in everybody’s interest to support PT, if only so they get a freer run in their car.
Much better AT.
OK finally got some time to go through the new information and have to say I am very disappointed.
It currently takes 42 Minutes from Manukau to Brittomart. Post CRL Manukau to the new K’Rd station will also be 42 minutes. This indicates a minor increase in efficiency to travel the 2.4 km.
At peak there is currently a train every five to ten minutes or six trains per hour from the Manurewa station. Post CRL “A train about every five to 10 minutes at peak for most Auckland stations”. So no increase in frequency which means no additional capacity to move people.
So there is negligible increase in the travel time and no increase in frequency of trains during peak time meaning that the CRL is unlikely to solve Aucklands impending traffic slow down.
currently trains from Manurewa every 10 to 15 minutes. No way to increase this beyond 10 minute frequencies. Try getting from Manukau to K Road now, train to Newmarket Britomart, then LInk bus transfer, so CRL take 10 minutes of those journeys. To get to Aotea need 10 minute or more walk from Britomart, with CRL will take extra 2 mins to get there. Must remind you that Briromart is in North-East corner of CBD, so walking catchment doesnt cover large swathes of CBD. With CRL entire CBD under 10 minutes walk.
Best time saving of CRL is on the Western line. If you travel form New Lynn to Aotea then currently 30 min train and 10 min plus walk, with CRL 20 minute train.
The CRL is in the Auckland plan as the panacea to easing traffic congestion. If the frequency of services cannot be increased then there is no additional capacity to A encourage people from the congested motorway onto trains and B population growth. Most of the trains are already near capacity at peak times and often the Eastern lines do not allow people on at the last two stations. All the CRL would have achieved is a $2.86B shortcut for the Western line.
I have never had an issue walking up Queen street from Brittomart and been able to get to the various places I haved work (Nelson Street, Aotea Square, Victoria street, Shortland street) within 10 minutes.