For a number of years I had the misfortune of being stuck catching Birkenhead Transport buses between the North Shore and the city – for university or work. Now there were many good aspects about Birkenhead Transport buses: such as the smallness of the organisation which meant you often knew the driver. However, there were also a number of highly annoying things – like the 1950s ticketing system, the lack of integration with other tickets around Auckland and the huge hike that I had to do between the city bus stop on the corner of Victoria and Albert Street and the university.

In more recent years there have been some efforts to get around this problem through the 971 and 972 buses that provide a direct link between areas served by Birkenhead Transport and the university. But in other respects they just add to the confusion as their route through the CBD is vastly different to ‘normal’ Birkenhead buses. Perhaps as a result of this, just about every afternoon 971/972 bus I’ve ever seen has been pretty empty.

The lack of access to the university was not the only annoying thing about the route taken by Birkenhead buses in the CBD. There was also the trip down Albert Street, which could on a bad day take around 15 minutes. This has been partly fixed by the Albert Street bus lanes, although the complexity of traffic operations there mean that the lanes are extremely stop-start: and there are still some really nasty bottlenecks around the corner with Customs Street, and then (once the Birkenhead buses have done their silly loop down to Quay Street) at the corner of Hobson Street and Fanshawe Street.

The poor routing through the CBD for North Shore buses is not confined to Birkenhead Transport either. Most North Shore buses end up having to do a long trek along Albert Street before joining the highly congested Customs/Fanshawe Street area and making their way out of the city (obviously the reverse in the morning, although CBD congestion never seems so bad in the morning peak). The routes for a decent chunk of North Shore services is shown in the diagram below:
One thing that immediately becomes clear when looking at the diagram above is just how indirect it is. The other thing that’s obvious is how complicated the routings need to become in order to provide a service to the university (and, in the form of the 881, to Newmarket).

Surely there’s a better way to do this? And remember it’s not just the services in the diagram above that could be simplified. Add in Birkenhead Transport buses, add in other North Shore buses – pretty much everything except the Northern Express which has a pretty simple route. Surely there’s a way to take a bit of pressure off Albert Street, which gets pretty congested for buses even with its bus lanes at peak times. Surely there’s a way to provide better direct access between the universities and the North Shore (a significant patronage pattern) and a way to simplify the system so there’s one major bus stop to turn up at to catch all these buses – so in many cases you can just get the next one that comes along.

Well I think what we need to look at is directing the buses along a route that is probably very similar to what I’ve drawn in the map below – effectively a major route along Wellesley Street.
The route is in green, and effectively follows Fanshawe Street, right into Halsey Street and then straight through into Wellesley Street. The buses could then either turn around by doing a Princes Street, Alfred Street, Symonds Street. Wellesley Street loop, or continue over State Highway 16 and turn around somewhere over by Grafton Road. Significantly sized bus stops (they’d have to be considering the large number of buses using them) would be located roughly in the vicinity of the red dots that are on the map above: meaning one just off the motorway on Fanshawe, another on Wellesley Street near the intersection with Sale Street, a third around the corner of Albert Street and Wellesley Street (probably a bit further east than what I’ve drawn so that it’s nice and close to Queen Street) and the last one right in the heart of the universities (or potentially on Alfred Street outside Auckland University’s main library).

It would be necessary to improve the bus priority along this route. Bus lanes already exist along Fanshawe Street, but would need to be added to Halsey Street. One of the two right-turn lanes from Fanshawe into Halsey Street would probably need to be made bus only, and the left lane of Halsey Street (which is currently left-turn only into Victoria Street) would need to allow buses to travel straight ahead – and probably be a bus lane. For outbound buses, parking along the edge of Victoria Park would probably need to be restricted at peak times to provide a bus lane. Along Wellesley Street, you would probably need bus lanes in both directions – ideally at all times but definitely at peak times. Finally, you would need lengthy and very high quality bus stops as they would be used by a very large number of services.

The only disadvantage I can see is that you would create more of a separation between these services and Britomart train station – making transfers between the two more difficult. In the longer term this won’t matter as the route will pass very close to the Midtown train station – and allow for excellent bus/train transfers at that point. I think in the meanwhile the advantages of this route would probably outweigh the disadvantages – but there would be certain drawbacks.

I hope that Auckland Transport is looking at making improvements like this. Many of our bus routes take complex, convoluted and plain illogical routes through the CBD that seem to result from little more than being historic relics of the past. It’s time we took a good long look at how to improve buses in the CBD to reduce delays, improve access and create a better and more user-friendly system. I think this would be a very significant step in the right direction on that matter.

Share this

19 comments

  1. And what do the large numbers of people who board opposite the Herald and outside that food court at the bottom of Albert St do?

    We are supposed to be making it easier for passengers to use PT, not dream up route changes that disadvantage large numbers!

  2. Chris, my experience of catching North Shore buses is that most people catch them from the midtown area rather than the downtown area. As I said, there will be some people who are worse off, but I think they’re significantly outweighed by those who would be better off.

  3. I use BT most days to get to Auckland Uni and I find them to be quite good. It only takes 10 minutes to walk from the bus stop to Uni (although it would be nice if there wasn’t Albert Park to walk up). But they have timed the buses well, giving you time to get to/from lectures.
    The ticketing problem has certainly been helped by the Northern Pass which is excellent. As a student it saves me half of what I would normally pay and I can use it on any North Shore bus. It also saves the drivers alot of time.
    With regards to bus stops, the Downtown one is well patronised, sometimes even more so than the Vic Street one. However, there is another on Albert Street just down from the District Court which they should probably get rid of as not many people use it. I read in Joel Cayford’s blog that they were considering using the Cook Street off-ramp for bus routes which could be a good idea.

  4. As a new but recycled councillor I agree w/ your general sentiments on the route taken by Birkenhead Transport through the Auckland CBD. I have not talked one-on-one w/ Mr Warburton (ATA CEO) yet but hope to get a meeting arranged soon. I would like to to think that this type of excellent work can get to the table and the issues that you raise resolved. It is interesting that Birkenhead Transport have stopped at the same stop in Victoria St West, as their city terminus, and they follow the same route since the AHB opened in 1959. Birkenhead refused to change their route through the CBD when Stagecoach/NorthStar changed to doing the Mayoral Drive loop about six years ago. The Public Transport Management Act 2008 was supposed to remove this intransigence.

    1. Hi George, very pleased to have you visiting and commenting here!

      A lot of the bus companies seem very “set in their ways” and are very conservative about any change – even if it is change that will be likely to benefit them in the long run. I’ve often felt exasperated that they’re more keen on maintaining their share of the “PT pie” as opposed to growing the pie.

      The PTMA was meant to fix this mess, but unfortunately interested parties put a lot of pressure on the government to make changes to that legislation. The changes have not yet been announced or made, but the threat of them has meant that ARTA (and now AT) seem very unwilling to “flex the muscles” that the PTMA provided them with. Which is a pity.

      1. I can understand some of the sentiment as people inconvenienced are likely to complain bitterly if they change the route, whereas people who like the changes are not likely to compliment the company. I would say the best thing would be to have buses that go to different regions of Auckland using the same route and having these routes intersect in order to allow transfers easily. Hopefully with integrated ticketing idle time be decreased and subsequently smaller bus stops will be decreased.

  5. BT have had 2 buses that run to Auckland university for years now. One runs from Beach Haven shops, along Beach Haven Rd, along Lauderdale, Eskdale, Verbena, Mokoia, Highbury, and down the Onewa bus lane. The other one runs through Chatswood. They then go through the city via Customs St, Anzac Ave and up to the University via Princes St. Both are extremely well patronised and those people that aren’t directly on the routes seem to park and ride. The bus lanes down Onewa, and through the City I think are a blessing and tend to make trips to/from the city much easier than sitting in a car and yes there are the occasional bottlenecks but how is that ever going to change with all the people that just HAVE to take their cars into the city because there is no way they could ever be seen to catch public transport. I agree that there should be an integrated ticketing system, but am sure that this is not far away.

  6. Having NS buses run EW accross Auckland CBD is a great idea.
    Try mapping that route alongside the current NEX to Britomart and then the 962 and 966 which go along K road and then grafton brige.
    This provides a nice E-W CBD bus grid allowing North Shore patrons to get basically anywhere in the CBD and to transfer onto N-S routes from Dominion road etc.

    Nice topic choice admin and great to see a councillor posting.

  7. A further suggestion:

    All North Shore services using your suggested Wellesley St corridor, plus the Northern Express which presently terminates at Britomart, could continue on via the busway to turn around at Newmarket.

    Reason:

    Direct link for the entire population north of the Waitemata to University of Auckland, AUT, Auckland City Hospital and Newmarket. No transfer required. Would create fantastic connectivity across the entire bus network, allowing transfers at any of the stops along the Britomart-Newmarket busway and at the Grafton and Newmarket stations.

  8. It is silly running all the NEX’s to Newmarket if there is plenty of spare capacity on existing services running along the Central Connector. Remember that people coming off the NEX would be boarding services going against the peak flow. There just needs to be very obvious points around Britomart where all the Central Connector services depart from so the change is easy.

    The other alternative is the Northern Express could be linked with a southern service, such as the services down Great South Road which could then terminate at Manakau. This would ensure there is not too much duplication. These GSR services need streamlining anyway, a reliable 10 min frequency from Britomart to Manukau City would be great to serve the GSR corridor. As it deviates from rail at a fair few points I dont think this would be duplication of rail.

  9. Extending the NEX to Newmarket via the Central Connector busway is a total no brainer.

    Also extending the Albert corridor runs to turn around near K Rd might be a good idea too.

  10. Surely at some point there will be a ground swell for a Southern Busway.
    In Brisbane, bus patrons can continue through the CBD, with an underground Queen Street station .
    A bus tunnel would be a big ask, but now that we have a merged council can we finally itegrate our public transport?

  11. A southern busway from where, to where though? There is little point having one in parallel to the southern rail line.

    1. I Agree that we don’t want buses trying to compete with the rail lines but so often our bus services do try.

      I’d suggest using Dominion Road and then SH20 to create a Southern Busway, It would provide the Airport link until the Airport Rail line can be implemented. A branch could split off near Onehanga and head off to join AMETI via Sylvia Park.

      It’s basically providing solid links between sections which are all a bit patchy and formalising the route with stations like those on the Shore.

  12. Joining up Dominion Road services with Northern Express services could make some sense. That is, if we manage to get Dom Road bus lanes operating for extending periods of time. With such a long route and potentially so many people using the route, it would be critical for it to have excellent bus priority to ensure the buses stayed on time.

  13. Would be good having some Dominion Road services heading to points further south/east in the city. At the moment the Dominion Road services are great if you are heading into the CBD area but rubbish if you are going anywhere else.
    This applies to all the ‘tramline’ services (Sandringham, Mt Eden).
    Having a service that went to at least Onehunga would be great, as Onehunga is a major interchange point for that area. From here people could connect to buses to Otahuhu, Pakuranga, Mangere etc.

    1. Those are good ideas Luke though we need to be wary of not trying to provide “everywhere to everywhere” direct services, as that leads to overly complex routings and very very low frequencies (ie. the story of Auckland’s bus network over the past 30 years).

  14. The plight of the public who patronise Birkenhead Transport and have to utilise the THIRD WORLD condition of embarkation and disembarkation in Victoria Street West is solid proof as to how little interest in that situation has come from any of the Council politicians in the Former North Shore City over the past 20 years. Nothing has changed for those commuters in at least 30 years as local pollies are not interested whatsoever , because in the main THEY dont use the service on a daily basis over several years as I did. The facilities of virually no seating, lonly a shop front for shelter is a reflection on the ARC, ARTA, North Shore City Council, and Auckland City Council.
    The new Auckland Council must have survellience put upon them together with Local Boards to redress this third world facilty. Auckland is light years behind the City of Brisbane where Public Transport is concerned particularly thier excellent bus and train services. A delight to use!

  15. Good to see you found this blog Ray. I’ve been using the buses to get into council meetings; get dropped off in Mayoral Drive behind the Aotea Centre – quick walk across Aotea Square and I am there. The ticketing and concession card system – you don’t really want to try and understand it – is a mess! I’ve sent a letter to Mr Dave Warburton the new CEO of Auckland Transport about this Birkenhead Transport terminus in Victoria Street West. It has been the same since May 1959 when the Auckland Harbour Bridge opened (The seat that they replaced is the only improvement).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *