Statistics New Zealand has compiled a very interesting document that analyses commuting patterns in the Auckland region. While commuter trips generally account for less than half of all trips within the Auckland region (“errand trips” like dropping kids at school or driving to the shops account for the highest proportion) because commuter trips generally happen around the same time they tend to cause congestion and also tend to be the trips for which people are most likely to use public transport.
Here’s a summary of what the document says: I’m most interested in the parts of the document that analyse where people travel to and from for their commuting, rather than how Auckland relates to New Zealand as a whole, although it is interesting to note that the metropolis’ commuting zones extend well beyond the region.
Just sticking with those who live outside Auckland, but work within Auckland, the table below shows where all those who work in the Auckland region live. Of course the vast majority of people also live within Auckland, but there are some surprisingly high numbers of people who commute seemingly vast distances from the Waikato and Northland regions (and even a few from the Bay of Plenty – I assume they don’t go there and back each day!) to Auckland. Well over 1000 people sit in three Waikato districts that would potentially be well served by a Hamilton-Auckland commuter train.
But getting back to commuting patterns within Auckland, while it’s well know that only around 12% of the Auckland region’s jobs are within the Auckland CBD, it seems as though commuting patterns in Auckland are still fairly “Auckland City centric”. Some interesting bits of information from the above statistics show:
- 28,000 people who live in North Shore City work in Auckland City, with only 7,000 doing the opposite.
- Almost 31,000 people who live in Waitakere City work in Auckland City, with only 6,000 doing the opposite.
- 41,000 people who live in Manukau City work in Auckland City, with only 16,000 doing the opposite.
Other cross-city flows are perhaps lower than I thought they would be. West to north is around 4,000, and west to south just over 3,000. I always thought that there are a lot of people trying to do Waitakere City to East Tamaki commutes and getting nailed by much of the worst traffic Auckland has to offer, but perhaps the numbers are lower than I had anticipated there. Also, only around 4,400 people travel either from North Shore City to Manukau City or vice versa.
A lot of these statistics are fairly promising. They show that, at least in terms of looking at things from this rather “high-level” breakdown, people generally seem to live in the same part of the city that they work. Waitakere City is probably the lowest in this respect – as almost as many people who live in Waitakere City work in Auckland City as they do in their local area. Patterns across the whole city are shown below: To put things simply, it seems as though either people work within their own areas or they work in Auckland City. A very interesting next question would be “where in Auckland City”, but unfortunately the document only produces a pretty hopeless map for that (page 6, I am not even going to bother inserting it here). It would be interesting to know whether commuters to Auckland City from Waitakere, Manukau and North Shore are more likely to have their jobs in the CBD, or whether they’re more likely to have their jobs in parts of Auckland City closest to them. I would assume that commuters from the North Shore would be more likely to have jobs in the CBD than the Penrose/Mt Wellington area, but this might not be true for those from Manukau City, because Penrose/Mt Wellington is much closer.
So what to make of all this? From a transport perspective it is good to see a large proportion of people working relatively closer to where they live – as this puts less pressure on the transport system. I certainly don’t think Auckland would be better off with more people going from Waitakere to Manukau, or from Manukau to the North Shore to work. It would seem as though Auckland City is certainly still a major magnet for jobs – both from within the city itself but also from North Shore, Manukau and (perhaps most particularly) Waitakere.
Looking at Waitakere City in a bit more detail, there’s a rather interesting map that attempts to show the dispersal of trips from Waitakere City residents either within the area or to other cities (most predominantly Auckland City). These trips do seem quite “CBD area” focused, and certainly come from a variety of parts of west Auckland. A map like this seems to show that a Northwest Busway might be a pretty damn good idea. I must say I’m surprised that the flows to other parts of Auckland City – particularly the Penrose/Mt Wellington employment centre, aren’t higher.
All up, whilst it would certainly be interesting to see more detail on commuter patterns to different parts of Auckland City, data like this is certainly useful in helping to form an understanding of what’s actually going on around Auckland. The next census is taking place next year, so it’ll be interesting to see if the data has changed much since 2006.
This is just further evidence for what is something of an open secret in transport planning circles, in general people either work near where they live or the commute in a radial fashion. All this talk of suburb-to-suburb trips and ‘modern cross town journeys to work’ ignores the fact that people generally commute toward or away from the city, on radial corridors that are easy to furnish with public transport. As shown above roughly half the people work in their local area and half work on the ithsmus, with only 5% or so living in one suburban region and working in another.
Jarbs, you’ve quoted the figure of ‘only’ 12% of jobs being in the CBD, but looking at the diagram above that probably has more to do with the definition of the CBD than anything else. I had a quick look at the census data and if you consider the ‘central city’ (including Newmarket, Parnell, Ponsonby and Eden Terrace) then the share of regional jobs in that area is around 35%.
Yes you’re right Nick – certainly in terms of how one defines the CBD. There’s certainly a lot of office blocks in Newmarket, Grafton, Eden Terrace, Newton, Ponsonby etc.
I guess public transport needs to be made more useful for people commuting from one part of Waitakere/Manukau/North Shore cities to another part.
It’s also worth noting the 360 people who commute from Tauranga to the Auckland metropolis (and a further 24 to Papakura) if we want a Kaimai Express type service to be reinstated in the future.
I think a reasonable number of those “out of town commuters” would probably be people who have apartments in the city where they live during the week, or friends who they stay with during the week. It’s a bit hard to imagine someone commuting from Rotorua to Auckland and back each day.
The title states “By usual residence” so in those cases wouldn’t they count as living in Auckland?
Its self selected so perhaps they don’t perceive their usual residence as being in Auckland.
I n0minate this as reply the year s0 far:
Q:[Jarbs, you’ve quoted the figure of ‘only’ 12% of jobs being in the CBD, but looking at the diagram above that probably has more to do with the definition of the CBD than anything else. I had a quick look at the census data and if you consider the ‘central city’ (including Newmarket, Parnell, Ponsonby and Eden Terrace) then the share of regional jobs in that area is around 35%.]E/Q
Thanks Nick, and when you also consider sylvia park and manakau city are on the line,
just to name a few labour hubs..a better picture emerges of what great potential
Auckland rail network has.
It’s not just.”getting on at Glen Innes and hopping off at Britomart”…It’s all sorts
of directions…including the not too shabby figure of 17,000 in manakau City that could
be superbly served by trains. All good news..because it means anti-peak direction trains would also (could) be well patronised.
Jarbs – any news on the RLTS and whether they will change SH16 to a RTN?
Matt, I am not sure. I think a final RLTS will go to the Regional Transport Committee’s April meeting, and then the ARC needs to sign it off before April 30th.
Mike Lee has read a couple of my posts about it and seems to be warming to the idea.
Good evidence why we need a central city rail loop. 1. Britomart is at the edge of CBD- so there’s a long uphill walk once you are in town. 2.The train is too slow to get into town from the West once you detour via Newmarket.
Its interesting that so many of the Titirangi/Laingholm/Scenic Drive people work in town. Bet most of those drive, shows that a park and ride at New Lynn would be a good investment. Then you would need to align train service to real office hours (ie you need regular services to at least 8PM!).
TopCat, I wonder whether generally those living in the “richer” areas are more likely to have “white collar” jobs either in the CBD or in the areas surrounding it, while those in more working class suburbs may be more likely to have jobs in Mt Wellington/Penrose/East Tamaki.
I hate to generalise, but it would be interesting to see if the stats backed that up.
You’d have to see the stats but a fair assumption Joshua. And isn’t that the irony. By investing in better rail services you are more likely to benefit white collar workers (and uni students) who live in the suburbs than blue collar industrial workers who likely start work very early and have more dispersed work locations.
Indeed TopCat. There is certainly an irony there. That is why we need our public transport to have long operating hours and to have effective local feeder buses so that people can use PT for trips within their “city”.